MAMA KILPATRICK - A CONGRESSWOMAN NO LESS -
SHOULD - SHUT UP!
SHE SAID, 'WERE GOING TO APPEAL' - SINCE WHEN DOES SHE SPEAK FOR DETROIT. SHE IS WRONG TO SPEAK UP FOR HER SON, IN THIS SITUATION.SHE IS WRONG TO ENCOURAGE HIM TO APPEAL.
HOPEFULLY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL HAVE THE COURAGE, BACKBONE AND GUTS TO STAND UP AND SAY - IT'S FINISHED, DETROIT TAXPAYERS WILL NOT PAY FOR AN APPEAL - THIS IS A PERSONAL MATTER NOW, KILPATRICK - FAMILY AND FRIENDS CAN PAY FOR AN APPEAL, NOT DETROIT TAXPAYERS..
NOW IS THE TIME FOR THE DETROIT CITY COUNCIL TO STAND UP..STAND UP FOR DETROIT. CALL (313 224 4500) - COUNCILMAN KEN COCKREL, JR AND TELL HIM TO STAND UP FOR DETROIT - END THE LAWSUIT NOW. PAY AND WALK AWAY.
************************ **************************************************************
Facilitators and Enablers - those who support Mayor Kilpatrick.
"Even an ameba,(a one cell organism) knows better than to investigate the Mayor" - PC Jerry Oliver. That tells the awful TRUTH - that people think the Mayor is above the law - and he has acted that way and continues to lie deny and cover up his criminal acts - which are now hopefully being investigated by the Dept of Justice and FBI, at my request.
The Attorney General investigation was a farce and a crime in itself.I had to deal with a police department that if riff with nepotism, favoritism and croynism.It is poorly lead by police executives who make political decisions not decisions based on sound police policies.
This was proved in the Whistle Blower case - The people of Detroit, visitors and police officers are not properly being protected by the police department because of poor decisions made by police exectives that aren't capable of making those decisions and who are politically corrupted.
The failure after four years to meet compliance with the Dept of Justice Consent Decrees shows Detroit doesn't have the leadership to comply with the law and protect Detroit residents.Detroit has had poor political leadership - from its Mayors, City Council Members and school board members and a bad police department since - Coleman Young and it continues today - that needs to change, but it won't because the people of Detroit are being lied to and lead by people with poor ethical and leadership skills.
Detroit residents, visitors, school children and police officers deserve better.
***************************** *************************************************************
CIVIL LAWSUITS are different than criminal lawsuits.
The burden of proof is preponderance of the evidence and the Plantiffs did show that they were fired for trying to report and investigate criminal misconduct by Mayor Kilpatrick, which was their duty.
Remember this quote - " even an ameba is smart enough not to investigate the Mayor (Kilpatrick)" that from x-Detroit Police Chief Jerry Oliver, who was sworn to uphold the law, but abdicated his ethical, legal and morale responsibility and allowed DC Brown to be fired.
They were assembling and reporting information of criminal conduct by the Mayor, his wife and his body guards. They were stopped / fired for doing this - now hopefully the Department of Justice / FBI will begin to examine this information further, at my request.
The Michigan State Police investigation was obstructed by Attorney General Michael Cox, for political purposes and gain - he must be investigated, also - along with Governor Granholm.MSP Investigators are still collecting information about the cases.
Overtime abuses by Jones and Martin, which would have landed any regular police officer in jail or fired, were not pursued by the City or Attorney General - Why Not????? There was ample evidence presented by the Plaintiffs to justify this $6.5+ million dollar award and it should have been higher.
The City just spent $7.million dollars paving 10 acres of Belle Isle - where did this money come from - come from - the taxpayers of Detroit.
And now comes word to contradict the Mayor - he lied - Detroit has a budgeted $40 million dollar fund to pay for lawsuits against the City.
And look for $$$$$ Millions of dollars to be paid to @ 400 complainants in the Grace v. Detroit (Police) residency lawsuit, that the City lost - compensation packages are being prepared now - some will go out by the end of September. In this lawsuit the Plantiffs won because the City would not take applications for the Police Department from suburbanites.
The DPD is also facing a lawsuit for violating Equal Employment Opportunity Laws (EEOC) in and around 2004 - EEOC laws - for not properly processing white applicants.- where are the civil rights activists - now, more millions to be lost by the Kilpatrick / Bully-Cummings adminstration. They don't LEARN.
Friday, September 14, 2007
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
HIP HOP MAYOR KILPATRICK - GUILY - RESIGN
FYI...........
the verdict in the whistle blower case against the city and the mayor - shows the cesspool of corruption in the Detroit political leadership from the mayor, city council to school board continues - starting with Coleman Young and continuing today.
Detroit needs new political leadership ...now...and a new police chief not tied to the mayor...residents, visitors and Detroit police officers need to know that the Police Department is led by executives who make the best decisions to protect them - not political decisions. David L. Malhalab
Sgt DPD Retired
the verdict in the whistle blower case against the city and the mayor - shows the cesspool of corruption in the Detroit political leadership from the mayor, city council to school board continues - starting with Coleman Young and continuing today.
Detroit needs new political leadership ...now...and a new police chief not tied to the mayor...residents, visitors and Detroit police officers need to know that the Police Department is led by executives who make the best decisions to protect them - not political decisions. David L. Malhalab
Sgt DPD Retired
Friday, September 7, 2007
BAD FOOD WARNING...NEW LAWS NEEDED
FYI..... check your store..
Staples, Michigan Ave /Dearborn, store sold outdated M&Ms (dark chocolate) packages last week, parents and persons who bought them should return them or contact M&M (800 627 7852)..
The coding on the outdated M&Ms is - 631CRCLVO7 - this package was good for 52 weeks but the coding means that the package is 57 weeks old.
M&M customer service rep says that you won't get sick eating them - but the taste won't be the same.
Staple Mgr said they had the packages since January 07 - and were clearing them out. The Mgr couldn't decipher the coding...
fyi... 6 (yr made) 31 (week made) CRCLV (plant) 07 (line made on).........
Michigan needs a uniform food coding law - so that everyone can tell when a food product is unwholsome to eat...NOW....
Contact your state Representatives and Senators and your US Represenatives and Senators... NOW... don't wait till you get sick or your children do....
www.detroituncovered.com HAS REPORTED THAT DETROIT POLICE OFFICERS HAVE BEEN TOLD - NOT - TO TICKET STORES SELLING BAD FOOD...IT'S NOT RIGHT! CALL DETROIT CITY COUNCIL AND DEMAND ENFORCEMENT...( 313 224 4500)....
Check your food items for its coding..report all expired foods items being sold to your local police department and health departments, and to the store manager (get his/her name) - don't think - 'oh someone else will do it' - it is up to you to protect your family.
If you can't understand the coding - ask the store manager to decode it - if he can't - call the store headquaters and the food company - and demand food codings that are clear and readable.
Its all up to YOU....
Staples, Michigan Ave /Dearborn, store sold outdated M&Ms (dark chocolate) packages last week, parents and persons who bought them should return them or contact M&M (800 627 7852)..
The coding on the outdated M&Ms is - 631CRCLVO7 - this package was good for 52 weeks but the coding means that the package is 57 weeks old.
M&M customer service rep says that you won't get sick eating them - but the taste won't be the same.
Staple Mgr said they had the packages since January 07 - and were clearing them out. The Mgr couldn't decipher the coding...
fyi... 6 (yr made) 31 (week made) CRCLV (plant) 07 (line made on).........
Michigan needs a uniform food coding law - so that everyone can tell when a food product is unwholsome to eat...NOW....
Contact your state Representatives and Senators and your US Represenatives and Senators... NOW... don't wait till you get sick or your children do....
www.detroituncovered.com HAS REPORTED THAT DETROIT POLICE OFFICERS HAVE BEEN TOLD - NOT - TO TICKET STORES SELLING BAD FOOD...IT'S NOT RIGHT! CALL DETROIT CITY COUNCIL AND DEMAND ENFORCEMENT...( 313 224 4500)....
Check your food items for its coding..report all expired foods items being sold to your local police department and health departments, and to the store manager (get his/her name) - don't think - 'oh someone else will do it' - it is up to you to protect your family.
If you can't understand the coding - ask the store manager to decode it - if he can't - call the store headquaters and the food company - and demand food codings that are clear and readable.
Its all up to YOU....
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Thank you for contacting me about the impeachment of the President and Vice President.
Under the U.S. Constitution, the power of impeachment lies solely with the House of Representatives. To remove the President, Vice-President or certain other officials, including federal judges, the Constitution requires an impeachment inquiry and approval by a majority of the House of Representatives. If the House approves the impeachment resolution, the matter is then sent to the Senate for trial. The Senate's trial determines whether to convict or acquit the person in question. Conviction requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate. Under the Constitution, the President, Vice President and other covered officials can only be removed from office upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
As you may know, on December 18, 2005, Representative John Conyers (D-MI) introduced House Resolution 635 (H.Res.635), which would have created a select committee to investigate the Administration's intent to go to war before congressional authorization, manipulation of pre-war intelligence, use of torture, and retaliation against critics of Administration policies.
Under the resolution, following this investigation, the committee would then make recommendations to the House of Representatives regarding potential grounds for impeachment, if any. This legislation was not considered by the adjournment of the 109th Congress.
In addition, Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI) introduced a resolution (S.Res.398) on March 13, 2006, to censure President Bush for authorizing the National Security Agency’s (NSA) electronic eavesdropping program. S.Res.398 was not considered by the full Senate before the adjournment of the 109th Congress. No legislation regarding impeachment of President Bush has been introduced during the 110th Congress.
As you may know, on April 24, 2007, Representative Dennis Kucinich introduced House Resolution 333 (H.Res.333), which sets forth articles of impeachment for Vice President Cheney. H.Res.333 states that Vice President Cheney actively sought to deceive the American public about the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and the country’s connection to al Qaeda. The Resolution also states that the Vice President’s comments regarding the use of military force in Iran are damaging to the national security interests of the United States. H.Res.333 has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, where it awaits further consideration.Should matters regarding impeachment of the President or Vice President be brought before the full Senate, I will be sure to keep your views in mind. Thank you again for contacting me.
Sincerely,
Carl Levin
Under the U.S. Constitution, the power of impeachment lies solely with the House of Representatives. To remove the President, Vice-President or certain other officials, including federal judges, the Constitution requires an impeachment inquiry and approval by a majority of the House of Representatives. If the House approves the impeachment resolution, the matter is then sent to the Senate for trial. The Senate's trial determines whether to convict or acquit the person in question. Conviction requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate. Under the Constitution, the President, Vice President and other covered officials can only be removed from office upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
As you may know, on December 18, 2005, Representative John Conyers (D-MI) introduced House Resolution 635 (H.Res.635), which would have created a select committee to investigate the Administration's intent to go to war before congressional authorization, manipulation of pre-war intelligence, use of torture, and retaliation against critics of Administration policies.
Under the resolution, following this investigation, the committee would then make recommendations to the House of Representatives regarding potential grounds for impeachment, if any. This legislation was not considered by the adjournment of the 109th Congress.
In addition, Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI) introduced a resolution (S.Res.398) on March 13, 2006, to censure President Bush for authorizing the National Security Agency’s (NSA) electronic eavesdropping program. S.Res.398 was not considered by the full Senate before the adjournment of the 109th Congress. No legislation regarding impeachment of President Bush has been introduced during the 110th Congress.
As you may know, on April 24, 2007, Representative Dennis Kucinich introduced House Resolution 333 (H.Res.333), which sets forth articles of impeachment for Vice President Cheney. H.Res.333 states that Vice President Cheney actively sought to deceive the American public about the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and the country’s connection to al Qaeda. The Resolution also states that the Vice President’s comments regarding the use of military force in Iran are damaging to the national security interests of the United States. H.Res.333 has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, where it awaits further consideration.Should matters regarding impeachment of the President or Vice President be brought before the full Senate, I will be sure to keep your views in mind. Thank you again for contacting me.
Sincerely,
Carl Levin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)